Comparison between biological and mechanical aortic valve prostheses in middle-aged patients matched through propensity score analysis: long-term results
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison between biological and mechanical aortic valve prostheses in middle-aged patients matched through propensity score analysis: long-term results
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 129-136
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2014-10-14
DOI
10.1093/ejcts/ezu392
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Perimount Valve in the Aortic Position: Twenty-Year Experience With Patients Under 60 Years Old
- (2014) Jessica Forcillo et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
- (2014) Nestoras Papadopoulos et al. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Selection of Aortic Valve Prostheses: Contemporary Reappraisal of Mechanical Versus Biologic Valve Substitutes
- (2013) Rakesh M. Suri et al. CIRCULATION
- Tissue Valve Is the Preferred Option for Patients Aged 60 and Older
- (2013) Tsuyoshi Kaneko et al. CIRCULATION
- Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Mechanical Versus Biologic Aortic Valve Prostheses in Older Patients
- (2013) J. Matthew Brennan et al. CIRCULATION
- CryoLife O'Brien aortic stentless prosthesis reoperations: clinical results and morphologic findings
- (2013) F. Ius et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
- Long-term results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position
- (2013) Amedeo Anselmi et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Noninferiority of Closely Monitored Mechanical Valves to Bioprostheses Overshadowed by Early Mortality Benefit in Younger Patients
- (2012) Vinay Badhwar et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012)
- (2012) et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
- Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age
- (2012) Alberto Weber et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Aortic valve surgery: Marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use—an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National database
- (2011) Joel Dunning et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement
- (2011) Vincent Chan et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Aortic Valve Replacement
- (2009) Paolo Stassano et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: Changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database
- (2009) James M. Brown et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions☆
- (2008) Cary W. Akins et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
- Aortic Valve Replacement: Choice Between Mechanical Valves and Bioprostheses
- (2008) Shuli Silberman et al. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY
- Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: Durability results up to 21 years
- (2008) Charles A. Yankah et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: Improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses
- (2008) Morgan L. Brown et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started