A comparison of outcomes between bovine pericardial and porcine valves in 38 040 patients in England and Wales over 10 years

Clinical registries: governance, management, analysis and applications

(2013) G. L. Hickey et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY

Differences in performance of five types of aortic valve prostheses: haemodynamic assessment by dobutamine stress echocardiography

(2012) Jeffrey P Khoo et al.   HEART

Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better?

(2012) K. H. Yap et al.   Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Aortic valve surgery: Marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use—an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National database

(2011) Joel Dunning et al.   JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

Hancock II Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Gold Standard of Bioprosthetic Valves Durability?

(2010) Tirone E. David et al.   ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY

Bovine Pericardium Versus Porcine Aortic Valve: Comparison of Tissue Biological Properties as Prosthetic Valves

(2010) Kangxiong Liao et al.   ARTIFICIAL ORGANS

Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Performance of the Hancock II Versus the Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses

(2010) V. Chan et al.   CIRCULATION

Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study

(2010) María José Dalmau et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY

The Complete Supraannular Concept: In Vivo Hemodynamics of Bovine and Porcine Aortic Bioprostheses

(2009) D. J. Ruzicka et al.   CIRCULATION

Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: Early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves

(2008) John B. Chambers et al.   JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY