4.6 Article

Acute respiratory dysfunction after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 691-696

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.07.016

Keywords

Aorta; Aortic dissection; Respiratory dysfunction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Acute respiratory dysfunction (ARD) can occur after acute type A aortic dissection, but relatively little is known about ARD in such patients. This study aims to analyse the clinical impact of ARD after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection and to assess possible treatment options. Methods: We reviewed our institutional database to identify patients who underwent surgery for acute type A dissection between October 1994 and January 2008 (n = 276). Postoperative ARD was defined as oxygenation impairment (PaO(2)/FiO(2) < 150) that occurred within 72 h of surgery and was not related to other documented causes of acute respiratory failure. Results: A total of 37 patients (13%) (27 mate, mean age 60.7 +/- 11 years) experienced ARD after surgery for acute type A dissection. Intensive care unit stay was significantly longer for patients with ARD than those without (18 +/- 11 days vs 7.5 +/- 6 days, respectively, p < 0.0001). However, hospital mortality was not significantly different between groups (16% for ARD patients vs 19% for patients without ARD, p = 0.6). Logistic regression analysis identified preoperative multiple malperfusion as the only risk factor for ARD (OR 3.2, 95% confidence interval (C. I.): 2.2-4.9). Peak C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in ARD patients (17.7 +/- 6.7 vs 9.6 +/- 5.4 mg dl(-1), p = 0.04). Prone positioning ventilation was performed in 15 patients (40%) with severely impaired oxygenation and resulted in an immediate increase in mean oxygenation index from 71.6 +/- 8.8 to 138 +/- 92.6 (p < 0.001). There was a tendency towards a shorter total time of mechanical ventilation (355 +/- 188 h vs 433 +/- 318 h, p = 0.2) and shorter ICU stay (405 +/- 198 h vs 505 +/- 265 h, p = 0.2) in the prone positioning subgroup. Conclusions: ARD is a relatively common complication of surgery for acute type A dissection and is associated with increased morbidity and resource utilisation. Patients with preoperative malperfusion are at increased risk for development of ARD. Prone positioning is a viable treatment option that significantly improves pulmonary oxygenation. (C) 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All. rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available