4.7 Article

Phase II study of biweekly cetuximab in combination with irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with platinum-resistant gastro-oesophageal cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 510-517

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.005

Keywords

Cetuximab; Irinotecan; Second-line treatment; Stomach cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck Serono
  2. Roche
  3. Danish Cancer Society, Denmark

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients and methods: Patients with failure to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received cetuximab 500 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) every second week until disease progression. Toxicity was evaluated according to The Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v. 3.0. Antitumour activity was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v. 1.0. Results: Sixty-three patients were enrolled, median age was 60 years, median performance status was 1 (0-1), 35 patients had two or more organs involved. The median number of courses was 5 (range 1-25). Response rate was 11% (6 partial response (PR)) and 37% had stable disease. Median progression free survival was 2.8 months and overall survival (OS) was 6.1 months. Grade 3-4 toxicity included: diarrhoea (6%), fatigue (5%), vomiting (5%) and neutropenia (16%). Two patients developed febrile neutropenia. Forty-six patients (73%) had developed grade 1-2 skin rash. Patients developing skin rash had a prolonged survival with an OS at 7.1 months. Conclusions: The combination of cetuximab and irinotecan is active as second-line therapy in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. Cetuximab induced skin rash was associated with prolonged survival. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available