4.7 Article

[18F]FLT: An imaging biomarker of tumour proliferation for assessment of tumour response to treatment

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 416-424

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.035

Keywords

Imaging biomarker; PET; Tumour response to chemotherapy; Proliferation

Categories

Funding

  1. IMI-JU European
  2. pharmaceutical company
  3. EFPIA companies
  4. Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI JU) [115151]
  5. MRC [MC_U120081322] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Cancer Research UK [11562, 10337] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U120081322] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paradigm of drug development is shifting towards early use of imaging biomarkers as surrogate end-points in clinical trials. Quantitative Imaging in Cancer: Connecting Cellular Processes (QuIC-ConCePT) is an initiative to qualify complementary imaging biomarkers (IB) of proliferation, cell death and tumour heterogeneity as possible tools in early phase clinical trials to help pharmaceutical developers in 'go, no-go' decisions early in the process of drug development. One of the IBs is [F-18]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine with Positron Emission Tomography (FLT-PET). We review results of recent clinical trials using FLT-PET for monitoring tumour response to drug treatment and discuss the potential and the possible pitfalls of using this IB as a surrogate end-point in early phase clinical trials for assessing tumour response to drug treatment. From first human trial results it seems that the degree of FLT accumulation in tumours is governed not only by the tumour proliferation rate but also by other factors. Nevertheless FLT-PET could potentially be used as a negative predictor of tumour response to chemotherapy, and hence evaluation of this IB is granted in multi-centre clinical trials. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available