4.7 Article

Restenosis and adverse clinical events after successful percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty: immediate post-procedural mitral valve area as an important prognosticator

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 1254-1262

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp096

Keywords

Mitral stenosis; Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty; Outcome; Echocardiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sought to investigate the factors associated with restenosis and its potential association with late clinical deterioration after successful percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV). We analysed echocardiographic (median 74 months) and clinical (median 109 months) follow-up data of 329 patients who achieved procedural success, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) >= 1.5 cm(2) and mitral regurgitation (MR) <= 2/4, between 1995 and 2000. Clinical events included cardiovascular death, mitral valve surgery, and repeat PMV. The 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 year rates of restenosis-free survival were 99 +/- 1%, 97 +/- 1%, 95 +/- 1%, 86 +/- 3%, and 72 +/- 4%, respectively. The 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 year rates of event-free survival were 99.7 +/- 0.3%, 96.4 +/- 1.0%, 94.5 +/- 1.3%, 90.8 +/- 1.6%, and 90.0 +/- 1.7%, respectively. Immediate post-PMV MVA and commissural MR or splitting, indicators of procedural adequacy, were independent predictors of both restenosis and clinical events. The best immediate post-PMV MVA cut-off value for predicting both restenosis and clinical events within 5 years after successful PMV were 1.8 cm(2) [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-1.9] and 1.9 cm(2) (95% CI = 1.7-2.0), respectively. Patients with immediate post-PMV MVA < 1.8 cm(2) showed significantly lower event-free survival rate than those with post-PMV MVA >= 1.8 cm(2) (P < 0.001). Immediate post-PMV MVA >= 1.8 cm(2) was an important predictor of both restenosis- and clinical event-free survival and this value should be considered as a component of optimal result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available