4.5 Article

Influence of sonication on Warner-Bratzler shear force, colour and myoglobin of beef (m. semimembranosus)

Journal

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue 4, Pages 553-559

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-011-1550-5

Keywords

Sonication; Beef; Tenderness; Colour; Myoglobin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research in the past few decades has shown the potential benefits of using ultrasound treatment as a technique to enhance tenderness and sensory properties of meat and its sub-products. The objective of current study was to assess whether the low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound treatment at 24 h postmortem affects the pH, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), colour (CIE L*a*b*c*H degrees), and relative proportions of myoglobin (Mb) redox forms and total Mb concentration during 96 h of beef (musculus semimembranosus) storage. Muscles were obtained from young bulls (n = 15) of Lowland Black and White breed slaughtered at a live weight of 475 (SD 16.1) kg. Ultrasound treatment did not have a statistically significant (p < 0.05) effect on the pH of meat directly after sonication (24 h postmortem), or at 72 and 96 h postmortem. Sonicated meat sample (S) was characterized by higher, but not statistically significant (p < 0.05), L* coordinate values 24, 48 and 72 h postmortem. During the whole storage period, colour coordinates a*b*c* and H degrees were not significantly (p < 0.05) affected by sonication. Ultrasound treatment accelerated the total colour change DE, limited the formation of MbO(2) and slowed down the formation of MetMb. Measurements carried out 48 and 72 h after slaughter revealed that the ultrasound treatment significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the WBSF. This study demonstrates the potential of low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound treatment at 24 h postmortem for beef tenderization without detrimental effects on its CIE colour parameters and relative proportions of Mb redox forms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available