4.5 Article

Studies on the protein composition and baking quality of einkorn lines

Journal

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 229, Issue 3, Pages 523-532

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-009-1081-5

Keywords

Einkorn; Protein composition; Gluten protein types; Baking quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

White flours from 23 einkorn breeding lines (assortment 1) and wholemeal flours from 24 einkorn lines (assortment 2) were investigated for their qualitative and quantitative protein compositions by means of a combined extraction/HPLC procedure. The HPLC patterns of the gliadin fractions enabled the differentiation of most einkorn samples. The absence of a group of gamma-gliadins at the beginning of the gamma-gliadin elution region was unique for einkorn compared to all other wheat species. Differences in the patterns of gamma-gliadins allowed the classification of einkorns into four groups; a further subdivision of these groups was possible by the number of omega 5-gliadins and the different patterns of alpha-gliadins and low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits. The total gluten protein (gliadins + glutenins) contents of einkorn flours were similar to or even higher than those of common wheat and spelt. Typical for einkorn flours was the extreme excess of gliadins over glutenins with omega 5-gliadins being most abundant and high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits being extremely rare. Micro-tests on the mixing properties and baking performance of assortment 2 flours revealed remarkable differences. Dough development time was negatively correlated with the ratio of gliadins to glutenins and positively with the content of glutenins; bread volume was mainly dependent on the content of glutenins. In conclusion, the determination of the quantitative gluten protein compositions offers a reliable indication of the expected baking quality during the early stages of breeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available