4.5 Article

Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: a 2-year longitudinal study in Korean school children

Journal

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 309-318

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-012-0374-6

Keywords

Cyber-bullying; Bullying; Depression; Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; Longitudinal study

Funding

  1. Korea Health 21 R&D, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A050047]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London
  3. King's College London
  4. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional bullying has received considerable research but the emerging phenomenon of cyber-bullying much less so. Our study aims to investigate environmental and psychological factors associated with traditional and cyber-bullying. In a school-based 2-year prospective survey, information was collected on 1,344 children aged 10 including bullying behavior/experience, depression, anxiety, coping strategies, self-esteem, and psychopathology. Parents reported demographic data, general health, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. These were investigated in relation to traditional and cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization at age 12. Male gender and depressive symptoms were associated with all types of bullying behavior and experience. Living with a single parent was associated with perpetration of traditional bullying while higher ADHD symptoms were associated with victimization from this. Lower academic achievement and lower self esteem were associated with cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization, and anxiety symptoms with cyber-bullying perpetration. After adjustment, previous bullying perpetration was associated with victimization from cyber-bullying but not other outcomes. Cyber-bullying has differences in predictors from traditional bullying and intervention programmes need to take these into consideration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available