4.6 Article

Isolating the pulmonary veins as first-line therapy in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using the Cryoballoon

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 197-203

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur299

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Ablation; Cryoballoon ablation; First-line treatment

Funding

  1. AF Solutions Medtronic
  2. Medtronic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Nowadays, catheter-based ablative approaches are mainly reserved for drug-refractory patients. However, the value of an ablative therapy as a first-line alternative remains elusive. The aim of our study was to analyse the acute procedural success and clinical outcome of patients with lone paroxysmal AF undergoing cryoballoon ablation (CBA) as first-line treatment. Methods and results Eighteen individuals (mean age 44 +/- 9 years, range 23-61 years, 15 males) with lone paroxysmal AF preferring a catheter-based treatment to drug treatment as first-line therapy were consecutively enrolled in our study. Mean left atrial size was 39 +/- 4 mm and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 58 +/- 3%. After a mean of 2.4 CBA (range 2-4) applications pulmonary vein (PV) isolation could be demonstrated in 70 (97%) PVs. Additional lesions with a focal ablation catheter were needed to isolate one right inferior pulmonary vein and one left superior pulmonary vein in two different patients. At the end of the procedure, all (100%) PVs were isolated. After a 2-month blanking period, 16 patients (89%) were free of symptomatic AF recurrence at a mean follow-up of 14 +/- 9 months and without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Conclusion Cryoballoon ablation in patients with lone paroxysmal AF yields a high acute efficacy rate with a great chance of being free of symptomatic AF recurrence without antiarrhythmic drugs on a mid-term follow-up period, when offered as a first-line treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available