Left ventricular lead implantation at a phrenic stimulation site is safe and effective

Pacing electrode selection in a quadripolar left heart lead determines presence or absence of phrenic nerve stimulation

(2010) B. Thibault et al.   EUROPACE

Influence of pacing configurations, body mass index, and position of coronary sinus lead on frequency of phrenic nerve stimulation and pacing thresholds under cardiac resynchronization therapy

(2010) M. Seifert et al.   EUROPACE

Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: Early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes

(2010) Giovanni B. Forleo et al.   HEART RHYTHM

Phrenic Stimulation

(2009) Mauro Biffi et al.   Circulation-Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

CRT delivery systems based on guide support for LV lead placement

(2009) Seth Joseph Worley   HEART RHYTHM

Long-Term Prognosis After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Related to the Extent of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling at Midterm Follow-Up

(2009) Claudia Ypenburg et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY

Automatic Management of Left Ventricular Stimulation: Hints for Technologic Improvement

(2009) MAURO BIFFI et al.   PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

(2008) Claudia Ypenburg et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY