4.5 Article

Creating novel chrysanthemum germplasm via interspecific hybridization and backcrossing

Journal

EUPHYTICA
Volume 177, Issue 1, Pages 45-53

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-010-0248-2

Keywords

Chrysanthemum; Interspecific hybridization; Backcross; Aphid resistance; Heat tolerance

Funding

  1. Basic Infrastructure Construction Plan of Science and Technology of Jiangsu Province [BM2008008]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [NCET-06-0489]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2006BAD01A1806]
  4. Ministry of Agriculture [2008-G3]
  5. The Shanghai Key Science and Technology for Agriculture Promotion Program [33]
  6. Program for Hi-Tech Research, Jiangsu, China [BE2008307]
  7. SRF for ROCS, SEM [[2008]890]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interspecific cross between Chrysanthemum x grandiflorum (Ramat.) Tzvel. 'rm20-12' (R, 2n = 54) and C. makinoi Matsum., and Nakai (M, 2n = 18) was achieved using embryo rescue, and a single backcross progeny using C. x grandiflorum 'rm20-12' as paternal parent was obtained. The morphology of the two independent F-1 hybrids (MR1 and MR2) differed from that of both parents. MR1 had a larger inflorescence diameter along with narrow leaves and a reduced number of ray and tubular florets. MR2 was shorter and its inflorescence developed fewer tubular florets than either M or R. The BC1F1 hybrid was similar to its maternal plant MR2 in terms of leaf length and width, inflorescence diameter and the number of ray florets, while it produced fewer tubular florets than either MR2 or R. The flower color in both F-1 hybrids was lavender, while the BC1F1 plant bore purple flowers. The aphid resistance and heat tolerance of MR1, MR2 and the BC1F1 hybrid were both significantly superior to that of C. x grandiflorum 'rm20-12'. Interspecific hybridization followed by backcrossing shows clear potential for cultivar improvement in chrysanthemum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available