4.6 Article

Low-frequency sea-level change in Chesapeake Bay: Changing seasonality and long-term trends

Journal

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages 30-38

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.03.014

Keywords

sea-level; climate; coastal zone; brackish water; hydrologic cycle; Chesapeake Bay

Funding

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [SFRH/BPD/23992/2005]
  2. Centro de Investigacao em Ciencias GeoEspaciais (CICGE)
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/23992/2005] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term sea-level variability in Chesapeake Bay is examined from long tide gauge records in order to assess the influence of climate factors on sea-level changes in this complex estuarine system. A time series decomposition method based on autoregression is applied to extract flexible seasonal and low-frequency components from the tide gauge records, allowing to analyse long-term sea-level variability not only by estimating linear trends from the records, but also by examining fluctuations in seasonal and long-term patterns. Long-term sea-level variability in Chesapeake Bay shows considerable decadal variability. At the annual scale, variability is mainly determined by atmospheric factors, specifically atmospheric pressure and zonal wind, but no systematic trends are found in the amplitude of the annual cycle. On longer time scales, precipitation rate, a proxy for river discharge, is the main factor influencing decadal sea-level variability. Linear trends in relative sea-level heights range from 2.66 +/- 0.075 mm/year (at Baltimore) to 4.40 +/- 0.086 mm/year (at Hampton Roads) for the 1955-2007 period. Due to the gentle slope of most of the bay margin, a sea-level increase of this magnitude poses a significant threat in terms of wetland loss and consequent environmental impacts. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available