Journal
ERGONOMICS
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 413-429Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2011.568636
Keywords
ergonomics; ergonomists; human factors; research-practice gap
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Significant discord has been aired regarding the widening research-practice gap in several disciplines (e. g. psychology, healthcare), especially with reference to research published in academic journals. The research-practice gap has profound and wide-ranging implications for the adequacy of ergonomics and human factors (E/HF) research and the implementation of research findings into practice. However, no substantive research on this issue has been identified in E/HF. Using an online questionnaire, practitioners were asked about their application of scientific research findings published in peer-reviewed journals and to suggest ways to improve research application in practice. A total of 587 usable responses were collected, spanning 46 countries. This article describes some of the key differences and correlations concerning reading, usefulness and barriers to application among respondents, who varied in terms of organisational type, percentage of work time devoted to application vs. research, Society membership and experience. Various solutions proposed by the survey respondents on ways to bridge the research-practice gap are discussed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available