4.2 Article

Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of isoflupredone and dexamethasone in the treatment of horses affected with recurrent airway obstruction ('heaves')

Journal

EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 419-424

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2746/042516403776014208

Keywords

horse; isoflupredone; dexamethasone; heaves; lung function; adrenal suppression; hypokalaemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reasons for performing study: Corticosteroids are currently the most effective drugs for the control of 'heaves' in horses. However, there is limited information concerning the comparative efficacy and tolerability of the various corticosteroids when used for treatment. Objectives: To compare the therapeutic and side effects of isoflupredone acetate to those of dexamethasone. Methods: A parallel design to compare the effects of 2 corticosteroids by evaluating lung function, serum cortisol and electrolyte concentrations, response to ACTH stimulation and haematology sequentially during a 14 day control period (no treatment), followed by 14 day treatment with either isoflupredone acetate (0.03 mg/kg i.m. s.i.d., n = 6) or dexamethasone (0.04 mg/kg i.v. si.d., n = 6) and 7 days of wash-out. Results: Both drugs were well tolerated clinically and resulted in a significant improvement in lung function that started on Day 3 and lasted for the treatment and wash-out periods. Blood cortisol levels were significantly decreased during the treatment period in both groups of horses, but a normal response to ACTH stimulation was preserved. Serum electrolytes concentration of horses receiving dexamethasone was not affected by the treatment, but horses treated with isoflupredone demonstrated a significant decrease in serum potassium level. Both treatments induced stress changes in haematology. Conclusions and potential relevance: Isoflupredone is as effective as dexamethasone in the treatment of 'heaves'-affected horses but associated with hypokalaemia. Even if clinical signs of hypokalaemia were not observed, this is a side effect that deserves further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available