4.2 Article

Influence of WIN 55,212-2 on the anticonvulsant and acute neurotoxic potential of clobazam and lacosamide in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure model and chimney test in mice

Journal

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages 1728-1733

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.10.004

Keywords

Clobazam; Lacosamide; Cannabinoids; WIN 55,212-2; Maximal electroshock-induced seizures; Chimney test

Funding

  1. National Science Centre (Krakow, Poland) [N N401 797640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of WIN 55,212-2 mesylate (WIN) on the anticonvulsant activity and acute neurotoxic potential of clobazam (CLB) and lacosamide (LCM) was studied in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure (MES) model and chimney test in mice. Results: indicate that WIN administered intraperitoneally, at doses of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant action of CLB in the MES test by reducing its median effective dose (ED50) from 20.80 mg/kg to 12.05 mg/kg (P< 0.05), and 8.22 mg/kg (P< 0.001), respectively. In contrast, WIN (1.25 mg/kg) did not significantly potentiate the anticonvulsant activity of CLB against MES-induced seizures. Similarly, WIN at doses of 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg had no significant impact on the anticonvulsant action of LCM in the MES test. On the other hand, WIN (5 mg/kg) had no impact on the acute neurotoxic effects of CLB and LCM in the chimney test and the median toxic doses (TD50) for CLB and LCM were almost unchanged. Thus, WIN (5 mg/kg) elevated the protective index values for CLB (from 1.41 to 3.07) and LCM (from 3.60 to 4.91). In conclusion, WIN potentiates suppression of tonic-clonic seizures produced by CLB in the mouse MES model, without affecting acute neurotoxic adverse effects of CLB in the chimney test in mice, which is favorable from a preclinical point of view. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available