4.5 Article

Determination of benzene series compounds and chlorobenzenes in water sample by static headspace gas chromatography with flame ionization detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 1916-1923

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201401434

Keywords

Benzene series; Chlorobenzenes; Gas chromatography; Static headspace sampling; Water samples

Funding

  1. Test Analysis of Science and Technology Plan Projects of Zhejiang Province [2013C37088]
  2. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [LQ13C200004, LQ14B070002]
  3. Major science and technology plan projects of Zhejiang Province [2012F20026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple, efficient, solvent-free, and readily commercially available approach for the determination of eight benzene series compounds and 12 chlorobenzenes in water samples using the static headspace sampling and gas chromatography with flame ionization detection has been described in this paper. The proposed static headspace sampling method was initially optimized, and the optimum experimental conditions explored were 10 mL water sample containing 20% w/v sodium chloride placed in a 20 mL vial and stirred at 70 degrees C for 43 min. The linearity of the method ranged from 1 to 200 mu g/L for 20 analytes, with correlation coefficients ranging between 0.9962 and 0.9994. The limits of detection were in the mu g/L level, ranging between 0.15 and 0.4 mu g/L. The relative recoveries of spiked benzene series and chlorobenzenes with external calibration method at different concentration levels in pure, tap, and sea water samples were 84-113, 78-115 and 85-119%, respectively, with relative standard deviations of 3.8-6.8, 4.1-5.8, and 4.8-5.4% (n = 5), respectively. That this method can be successfully applied to the determination of benzene series compounds and chlorobenzenes in pure, tap, and sea water samples, simultaneously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available