4.4 Article

Short-term outcome of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures after communication of the diagnosis

Journal

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 676-681

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.09.033

Keywords

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures; Non-epileptic attack disorder; Diagnosis; Outcome research; Quality of life; Prognosis

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-1207-15127]
  2. Ryder Briggs Trust
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-1207-15127] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  4. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-1207-15127] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously described a communication strategy for the delivery of the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) that was acceptable and effective at communicating the psychological cause of PNES. This prospective multicenter study describes the short-term seizure and psychosocial outcomes after the communication of the diagnosis and with no additional treatment. Participants completed self-report measures at baseline, two and six months after the diagnosis (seizure frequency, HRQoL, health care utilization, activity levels, symptom attributions and levels of functioning). Thirty-six participants completed the self-report questionnaires. A further eight provided seizure frequency data. After six months, the median seizure frequency had dropped from 10 to 7.5 per month (p=0.9), 7/44 participants (16%) were seizure-free, and an additional 10/44 (23%) showed greater than 50% improvement in seizure frequency. Baseline questionnaire measures demonstrated high levels of impairment, which had not improved at follow-up. The lack of change in self-report measures illustrates the need for further interventions in this patient group. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available