4.5 Article

The updated Charlson comorbidity index is a useful predictor of mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 146, Issue 16, Pages 2122-2130

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818002480

Keywords

Bacteraemia; comorbidity; mortality; staphylococcus aureus

Funding

  1. Castilla Leon Regional Health Authority (Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y Leon) [GRS881/A/13, INT/M/17/17]
  2. Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca [IBI14/0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective was to compare the performance of the updated Charlson comorbidity index (uCCI) and classical CCI (cCCI) in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). All cases of SAB in patients aged 14 years identified at the Microbiology Unit were included prospectively and followed. Comorbidity was evaluated using the cCCI and uCCI. Relevant variables associated with SAB-related mortality, along with cCCI or uCCI scores, were entered into multivariate logistic regression models. Global model fit, model calibration and predictive validity of each model were evaluated and compared. In total, 257 episodes of SAB in 239 patients were included (mean age 74 years; 65% were male). The mean cCCI and uCCI scores were 3.6 (standard deviation, 2.4) and 2.9 (2.3), respectively; 161 (63%) cases had cCCI score 3 and 89 (35%) cases had uCCI score 4. Sixty-five (25%) patients died within 30 days. The cCCI score was not related to mortality in any model, but uCCI score 4 was an independent factor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.74). The uCCI is a more up-to-date, refined and parsimonious prognostic mortality score than the cCCI; it may thus serve better than the latter in the identification of patients with SAB with worse prognoses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available