4.5 Article

BIOCONCENTRATION OF METHYLMERCURY IN MICROZOOPLANKTON IN A TEMPERATE RIVER

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 2860-2867

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.699

Keywords

Microzooplankton; Methylmercury; Mercury; Bioconcentration; Microseston

Funding

  1. GIST
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea
  3. Korean Government [2010-0024069]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0024069] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To understand the bioconcentration of methylmercury (MeHg) at the base of the riverine food chain, we determined levels of dissolved organic carbon, microseston, Hg, and MeHg in surface water in relation to the microzooplankton MeHg from Yeongsan River. The spatial distribution of unfiltered Hg (0.29-3.1 ng/L) and dissolved Hg (0.15-0.74 ng/L) closely followed the microseston distribution. The spatial distribution of unfiltered MeHg (0.0078-0.077 ng/L) and dissolved MeHg (0.0069-0.018 ng/L) increased with increasing distance from the river mouth and appeared to arise from the shallow wetlands surrounding the upper riverbanks and then to be transported downstream. The logarithm of the MeHg bioconcentration factor for microzooplankton ranged from 5.3 to 6.0 (5.7 +/- 0.18), and for microseston ranged from 4.0 to 5.4 (4.9 +/- 0.35). Linear correlation statistics comparing microzooplankton MeHg and river water characteristics revealed that microzooplankton MeHg concentration was most significantly correlated with unfiltered MeHg (r = 0.83) and particulate MeHg (r = 0.80) levels. This result suggests that MeHg in unfiltered river water, which is relatively easy to determine, can be used as a surrogate for MeHg in microzooplankton that may influence MeHg levels in higher-trophic-level organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2860-2867. (C) 2011 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available