4.5 Article

GENOTOXICITY OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC GAMMA-IRRADIATION ON ZEBRAFISH CELLS AND CONSEQUENCES FOR EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 2831-2837

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.695

Keywords

Gamma irradiations; DNA repair; gamma-H2AX; Zebrafish; Comet assay

Funding

  1. HEMI-BREAKS (Agence Nationale de la Recherche)
  2. Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety (ENVIRHOM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of radiation on biological systems have been studied for many years, and it is now accepted that direct damage to DNA from radiation is the triggering event leading to biological effects. In the present study, DNA damage induced by acute or chronic irradiation was compared at the cellular (zebrafish [Danio rerio] cell line ZF4) and developmental (embryo) levels. Zebrafish ZF4 cells and embryos (at 3 h postfertilization) were exposed within ranges of acute doses (0.3-2 Gy/d) or chronic dose rates (0.1-0.75 Gy/d). DNA damage was assessed by immunodetection of gamma-H2AX and DNA-PK (DNA double-strand breaks) and the alkaline comet assay (DNA single-strand breaks). Zebrafish embryo development and DNA damage were examined after 120 h. At low doses, chronic irradiation induced more residual DNA damage than acute irradiation, but embryo development was normal. From 0.3 Gy, a hyper-radiosensitivity phenomenon compared to other species was shown for acute exposure with an increase of DNA damage, an impairment of hatching success, and larvae abnormalities. These results suggest a dose-dependent correlation between unrepaired DNA damage and abnormalities in embryo development, supporting the use of DNA repair proteins as predictive biomarkers of ionizing radiation exposure. This could have important implications for environmental protection. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2831-2837. (C) 2011 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available