Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1935-1942Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.585
Keywords
Estuaries; Sediment toxicity; Ecosystem functioning; Egestion; Hydrobia ulvae
Categories
Funding
- III-UC (Instituto de Investigacao Interdisciplinar, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal) [III/36/2008]
- FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Portugal) [PTDC/AAC-AMB/105411/2008, PTDC/AAC-AMB/103547/2008]
- Ciencia FSE and POPH funds
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AAC-AMB/105411/2008] Funding Source: FCT
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In situ assays provide more realistic exposure scenarios than laboratory assays, which is particularly pertinent for estuaries because exposure conditions are difficult to simulate. Traditionally, sublethal toxicity testing endpoints, such as growth, emergence, and reproduction, imply time-delayed extrapolations from individuals to populations, communities, and ecosystems. Sublethal responses mechanistically linked to ecosystem functions have been largely neglected. Feeding is an unequivocal ecologically meaningful response because its impairment has direct and immediate effects on ecosystems, by hampering key functions such as organic matter decomposition, long before its effects at the individual level have consequences at successively higher levels of biological organization. The ultimate goal of the present study was to widen the range of ecosystem functions for estuarine quality assessments. Specifically, a short-term in situ assay based on the postexposure feeding of the mudsnail Hydrobia ulvae is presented. Methodologies to quantify precisely postexposure egestion as a surrogate of feeding were achieved. A multiple regression model from laboratory experiments was successfully applied to an in situ assay at reference (Mira River) and contaminated Portuguese estuaries (Sado River) for predicting reference results and allowing unraveling confounding factors during exposure (temperature, salinity, sediment grain size). Sensitivity comparisons of postexposure feeding with survival and growth, after Cu exposure, were carried out and used for a first preliminary appraisal of the relative consequences of ecosystem-level immediate effects. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:1935-1942. (C) 2011 SETAC
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available