4.7 Article

Novel Toxic Effects Associated with a Tropical Limnothrix/Geitlerinema-Like Cyanobacterium

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 260-270

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tox.20552

Keywords

ATP; cyanobacteria; cylindrospermopsin; freshwater; Geitlerinema; Limnothrix; Oscillatoriales; protein inhibition assay; Pseudanabaenacea; toxic response

Funding

  1. Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP)
  2. BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of a toxic strain of a fine filamentous cyanobacterium belonging to the Oscillatorialean family Pseudanabaenacea was detected during a survey of cyanobacterial taxa associated with the presence of cylindrospermopsin in dams in Central Queensland (Australia). The strain, AC0243, was isolated and cultured, its genomic DNA extracted and 16S RNA gene sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis placed AC0243 with Limnothrix species, although this genus appears polyphyletic. Moreover, not all morphological characters are consistent with this genus but more closely fit the description of Geitlerinema unigranulatum (R.N. Singh) Komarek and Azevedo. The potential toxic effects of AC0243 extract were assessed chemically and biologically. Cell free protein synthesis was inhibited by the extract. Exposure of Vero cells to the extract resulted in a significant reduction in cellular ATP levels following 24-72 h incubation. The presence of cylindrospermopsin was excluded based on the nature of responses obtained in cell and cell-free assays; in addition, (i) it could not be detected by HPLC, LC-MS, or immunological assay, and (ii) no genes currently associated with the production of cylindrospermopsin were found in the genome. Other known cyanobacterial toxins were not detected. The apparent novelty of this toxin is discussed. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 26:260-270, 2011.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available