4.5 Article

Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 2442-2447

Publisher

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141205

Keywords

SHARED DECISION MAKING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OMERACT; IMPLEMENTATION; OUTCOMES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT

Categories

Funding

  1. American College of Rheumatology and Rheumatology Research Foundation
  2. US National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AR060231-01]
  3. Mission recherche de la Direction de la recherche, des etudes, de l'evaluation et des statistiques (MiRe-DREES), IReSP
  4. Arthritis Society, Canada
  5. Oak Foundation
  6. Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
  7. University of Ottawa Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Despite the importance of shared decision making for delivering patient-centered care in rheumatology, there is no consensus on how to measure its process and outcomes. The aim of this Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) working group is to determine the core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in intervention studies in adults with osteoarthritis (OA), from the perspectives of patients, health professionals, and researchers. Methods. We followed the OMERACT Filter 2.0 method to develop a draft core domain set by (1) forming an OMERACT working group; (2) conducting a review of domains of shared decision making; and (3) obtaining opinions of all those involved using a modified nominal group process held at a session activity at the OMERACT 12 meeting. Results. In all, 26 people from Europe, North America, and Australia, including 5 patient research partners, participated in the session activity. Participants identified the following domains for measuring shared decision making to be included as part of the draft core set: (1) identifying the decision, (2) exchanging information, (3) clarifying views, (4) deliberating, (5) making the decision, (6) putting the decision into practice, and (7) assessing the effect of the decision. Contextual factors were also suggested. Conclusion. We proposed a draft core set of shared decision-making domains for OA intervention research studies. Next steps include a workshop at OMERACT 13 to reach consensus on these proposed domains in the wider OMERACT group, as well as to detail subdomains and assess instruments to develop a core outcome measurement set.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available