4.4 Article

Biodegradability and toxicity assessment of a real textile wastewater effluent treated by an optimized electrocoagulation process

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 496-506

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2014.952676

Keywords

textile wastewater; experimental design; biodegradability; electrocoagulation; toxicity

Funding

  1. FEDER through COMPETE - Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade [PEst-C/EQB/LA0020/2013, NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000050]
  2. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  3. QREN
  4. ON2
  5. Araucaria Foundation-BR
  6. CNPq-BR
  7. CAPES-BR [BEX 9794/11-5, 5512/10-7]
  8. FCT Investigator Programme [IF/01501/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the application of an iron electrode-based electrocoagulation (EC) process on the treatment of a real textile wastewater (RTW) was investigated. In order to perform an efficient integration of the EC process with a biological oxidation one, an enhancement in the biodegradability and low toxicity of final compounds was sought. Optimal values of EC reactor operation parameters (pH, current density and electrolysis time) were achieved by applying a full factorial 3(3) experimental design. Biodegradability and toxicity assays were performed on treated RTW samples obtained at the optimal values of: pH of the solution (7.0), current density (142.9 A m(-2)) and different electrolysis times. As response variables for the biodegradability and toxicity assessment, the Zahn-Wellens test (D-t), the ratio values of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) relative to low-molecular-weight carboxylates anions (LMCA) and lethal concentration 50 (LC50) were used. According to the D-t, the DOC/LMCA ratio and LC50, an electrolysis time of 15 min along with the optimal values of pH and current density were suggested as suitable for a next stage of treatment based on a biological oxidation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available