4.8 Review

Environmental and Health Impacts of Artificial Turf: A Review

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 2114-2129

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4044193

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41121063, 41202251, 41322024]
  2. Santa Clara Valley Water District
  3. SRF for ROCS
  4. SEM
  5. SEM, the Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y234081A07]
  6. Special Support Program of the Organization Department of CCCPC
  7. National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With significant water savings and low maintenance requirements, artificial turf is increasingly promoted as a replacement for natural grass on athletic fields and lawns. However, there remains the question of whether it is an environmentally friendly alternative to natural grass. The major concerns stem from the infill material that is typically derived from scrap tires. Tire rubber crumb contains a range of organic contaminants and heavy metals that can volatilize into the air and/or leach into the percolating rainwater, thereby posing a potential risk to the environment and human health. A limited number of studies have shown that the concentrations of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds in the air above artificial turf fields were typically not higher than the local background, while the concentrations of heavy metals and organic contaminants in the field drainages were generally below the respective regulatory limits. Health suggested that users of artificial turf fields, even professional athletes, were not exposed to elevated risks. Preliminary life cycle assessment suggested that the environmental impacts of artificial turf fields were lower than equivalent grass fields. Areas that need further research to better understand and mitigate the potential negative environmental impacts of artificial turf are identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available