4.8 Article

Vapor-Wall Deposition in Chambers: Theoretical Considerations

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 17, Pages 10251-10258

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es502170j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-1144469]
  2. Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0006626]
  3. NOAA Climate Program Office's AC4 program [NA13OAR4310058]
  4. State of California Air Resources Board [12-312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to constrain the effects of vapor wall deposition on measured secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yields in laboratory chambers, researchers recently varied the seed aerosol surface area in toluene oxidation and observed a clear increase in the SOA yield with increasing seed surface area (Zhang, X.; et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111, 5802). Using a coupled vapor-particle dynamics model, we examine the extent to which this increase is the result of vapor wall deposition versus kinetic limitations arising from imperfect accommodation of organic species into the particle phase. We show that a seed surface area dependence of the SOA yield is present only when condensation of vapors onto particles is kinetically limited. The existence of kinetic limitation can be predicted by comparing the characteristic time scales of gas-phase reaction, vapor-wall deposition, and gas particle equilibration. The gas particle equilibration time scale depends on the gas particle accommodation coefficient alpha(p). Regardless of the extent of kinetic limitation, vapor-wall deposition depresses the SOA yield from that in its absence since vapor molecules that might otherwise condense on particles deposit on the walls. To accurately extrapolate chamber-derived yields to atmospheric conditions, both vapor-wall deposition and kinetic limitations must be taken into account.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available