4.8 Article

Experimental Observation of Permeability Changes In Dolomite at CO2 Sequestration Conditions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 2445-2452

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4036946

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) Geothermal Technologies Program [EE0002764]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-1230691]
  3. Institute on the Environment (IonE) at the University of Minnesota (UMN) through its Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment (IREE)
  4. George and Orpha Gibson Foundation
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1230691] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Injection of cool CO2 into geothermally warm carbonate reservoirs for storage or geothermal energy production may lower near-well temperature and lead to mass transfer along flow paths leading away from the well. To investigate this process, a dolomite core was subjected to a 650 h, high pressure, CO2 saturated, flow-through experiment. Permeability increased from 10(-15.9) to 10(-15.2) m(2) over the initial 216 h at 21 degrees C, decreased to 10(-16.2) m(2) over 289 h at 50 degrees C, largely due to thermally driven CO2 exsolution, and reached a final value of 10(-16.4) m(2) after 145 h at 100 degrees C due to continued exsolution and the onset of dolomite precipitation. Theoretical calculations show that CO2 exsolution results in a maximum pore space CO2 saturation of 0.5, and steady state relative permeabilities of CO2 and water on the order of 0.0065 and 0.1, respectively. Post-experiment imagery reveals matrix dissolution at low temperatures, and subsequent filling-in of flow passages at elevated temperature. Geochemical calculations indicate that reservoir fluids subjected to a thermal gradient may exsolve and precipitate up to 200 cm(3) CO2 and 1.5 cm(3) dolomite per kg of water, respectively, resulting in substantial porosity and permeability redistribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available