4.8 Article

Pollution Trees: Identifying Similarities among Complex Pollutant Mixtures in Water and Correlating Them to Mutagenicity

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 13, Pages 7274-7282

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es300728q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program in the 11th Five Year Plan [2006BAI19B02, 2008ZX07421-004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30972438, 30771770]
  3. Key Project of National High-tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) [2008AA062501]
  4. Shanghai Education Commission [07SG01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are relatively few tools available for computing and visualizing similarities among complex mixtures and in correlating the chemical composition clusters with toxicological clusters of mixtures. Using the intersection and union ratio (IUR) and other traditional distance matrices on contaminant profiles of 33 specific water samples, we used pollution trees to compare these mixtures. The pollution trees constructed by neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum parsimony (MP), and maximum likelihood (ML) methods allowed comparison of similarities among these samples. The mutagenicity of each sample was then mapped to the pollution tree. The IUR-distance-based measure proved effective in comparing chemical composition and compound level differences between mixtures. We found a robust pollution tree containing seven major lineages with certain broad characteristics: treated municipal water samples were different from raw water samples and untreated rural drinking water samples were similar with local water sources. The IUR-distance-based tree was more highly correlated to mutagenicity than were other distance matrices, i.e., MP/ML methods, sampling group, region, or water type. IUR-distance-based pollution trees may become important tools for identifying similarities among real mixtures and examining chemical composition clusters in a toxicological context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available