4.7 Article

Linking cases of illegal shootings of the endangered California condor using stable lead isotope analysis

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 270-279

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.07.022

Keywords

California condor; Lead poisoning; Wildlife management; Endangered species; Lead isotopes

Funding

  1. United States Fish and Wildlife Service [P1082005]
  2. National Park Service [J8C07090004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lead poisoning is preventing the recovery of the critically endangered California condor (Gymnogyps califomianus) and lead isotope analyses have demonstrated that ingestion of spent lead ammunition is the principal source of lead poisoning in condors. Over an 8 month period in 2009, three lead-poisoned condors were independently presented with birdshot embedded in their tissues, evidencing they had been shot. No information connecting these illegal shooting events existed and the timing of the shooting(s) was unknown. Using lead concentration and stable lead isotope analyses of feathers, blood, and recovered birdshot, we observed that: i) lead isotope ratios of embedded shot from all three birds were measurably indistinguishable from each other, suggesting a common source; ii) lead exposure histories re-constructed from feather analysis suggested that the shooting(s) occurred within the same timeframe; and iii) two of the three condors were lead poisoned from a lead source isotopically indistinguishable from the embedded birdshot, implicating ingestion of this type of birdshot as the source of poisoning. One of the condors was subsequently lead poisoned the following year from ingestion of a lead buckshot (blood lead 556 mu g/dL), illustrating that ingested shot possess a substantially greater lead poisoning risk compared to embedded shot retained in tissue (blood lead 20 mu g/dL). To our knowledge, this is the first study to use lead isotopes as a tool to retrospectively link wildlife shooting events. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available