4.5 Article

Determination of hydrazine hydrate based on electrochemiluminescence of Ru(bpy)32+

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 185, Issue 5, Pages 4153-4158

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2857-9

Keywords

Determination; Electrochemiluminescence (ECL); Hydrazine hydrate; Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21272030]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT11LK21]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University
  4. State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology
  5. Key Laboratory of ECO-Textiles (Jiangnan University)
  6. Ministry of Education [KLET1102]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20100471434]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering of the basic properties and also the two nitrogen atoms in the structure, hydrazine hydrate was employed to be an amine additive candidate, to build a Ru(bpy) (3) (2+) /hydrazine electrochemiluminescence (ECL) system, and ECL of Ru(bpy) (3) (2+) has been employed for the determination of hydrazine hydrate in the paper. The result demonstrated that the logarithmic ECL increasing (Delta ECL = ECLafter addition of hydrazine -aEuro parts per thousand ECLbefore addition of hydrazine) versus the logarithmic concentration of hydrazine hydrate is linear over a concentration range of 1.0 x 10(-9) to 1.0 x 10(-5) mol/L, on both glassy carbon and Pt electrodes in a pH 9 phosphate buffer. The hydrazine hydrate detection limit was down to 1.0 x 10(-9) mol/L, comparatively lower than other detection methods. To check its applicability, the proposed method was applied to the determination of hydrazine hydrate added into a tap water sample with good reproducibility and stability. All these provide a possibility to develop a novel ECL detection method for hydrazine in water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available