4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Lead speciation in indoor dust: a case study to assess old paint contribution in a Canadian urban house

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 343-352

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-011-9380-8

Keywords

Indoor dust; Lead speciation; Old paint; X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy; Pb XANES

Funding

  1. Health Canada [CRRS/SDRC: 4500177216]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Residents in older homes may experience increased lead (Pb) exposures due to release of lead from interior paints manufactured in past decades, especially pre-1960s. The objective of the study was to determine the speciation of Pb in settled dust from an urban home built during WWII. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and micro-X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were performed on samples of paint (380-2,920 mg Pb kg(-1)) and dust (200-1,000 mg Pb kg(-1)) collected prior to renovation. All dust samples exhibited a Pb XANES signature similar to that of Pb found in paint. Bulk XANES and micro-XRD identified Pb species commonly found as white paint pigments (Pb oxide, Pb sulfate, and Pb carbonate) as well as rutile, a titanium-based pigment, in the < 150 mu m house dust samples. In the dust fraction < 36 mu m, half of the Pb was associated with the Fe-oxyhydroxides, suggesting additional contribution of outdoor sources to Pb in the finer dust. These results confirm that old paints still contribute to Pb in the settled dust for this 65-year-old home. The Pb speciation also provided a clearer understanding of the Pb bioaccessibility: Pb carbonate > Pb oxide > Pb sulfate. This study underscores the importance of taking precautions to minimize exposures to Pb in house dust, especially in homes where old paint is exposed due to renovations or deterioration of painted surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available