4.6 Article

Isotopic constraints on the origin of groundwater in the Ordos Basin of northern China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 505-517

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-011-1259-6

Keywords

Ordos Basin; Groundwater; Soil water; Hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes; Chloride ion; Basement fault

Funding

  1. Chinese University Doctor Foundation [20090094110007]
  2. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [50809024, 41073034, 40973001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite its extreme aridity, the Ordos Basin in northern China is rich in groundwater. Many artesian wells or springs with large fluxes are utilized for drinking, irrigation and industrial production. In a search for the origin of the groundwater, a detailed investigation of the stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen in the local precipitation, the river water, the springs, the well water, as well as the soil water extracted from six soil profiles in the Ordos Basin, was carried out. The data show that delta D, delta O-18 and TDS values of the river water are similar to those of groundwater, while the TDS values of the soil water are about ten times greater than those of groundwater. Furthermore, the mean isotopic compositions of the local precipitation are significantly higher than those of river water and groundwater. Based on the chloride mass balance method, the estimated recharge rates range from 5.2 to 17.2 mm/year, with a mean value of 10.5 mm/year. The results show that the main source of recharge of the groundwater in the Ordos Basin is not the local precipitation, but must come from a region where the precipitation is characterized by much lower delta D and delta O-18 values. In addition, the groundwater in the Ordos Basin contains a component of mantle-derived He-3 and crust-derived He-4 suggesting that the groundwater may partly derive from flows through basement faults beneath the Ordos Basin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available