4.7 Article

Differences between Pinus pinea and Pinus pinaster as bioindicators of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 339-347

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.04.012

Keywords

Pine needles; Biomonitoring; PAHs; Principal Components Analysis

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [SFRH/BD/11970/2002, PTDC-AGR-CFL-73156/06, PTDC/AGR-CFL/102597/2008]
  2. FCT [REEQ/1062/CTM/2005 e REDE/1512/RME/2005]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/11970/2002, PTDC/AGR-CFL/102597/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential of Univariate and Multivariate Analysis and specifically Principal Components Analysis (PCA), has been employed to assess the performance of pine needles as bioindicators of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and particularly emphasize the crucial importance of making a distinction between different pine species if more than one is sampled. Four sampling sessions were done in 29 sites and needles of two common pine species (Pinus pinaster Ait. in 19 sites and Pinus pinea L in 12) were collected and analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and PCA. The results obtained indicated significant differences between species, attributed to their different morphology. The mean total PAH concentration of the P. pinaster needles are over two times higher than P. pinea's. This difference is lower when the results are presented in lipid weight, but still statistically significant. Samples from the two sites with adjacent trees reinforce these conclusions, showing significant differences in terms of PAH mean concentration and aromatic ring patterns. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available