4.7 Article

Comparing climate policies to reduce carbon emissions in China

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 667-674

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.041

Keywords

Climate policies; Fossil fuel consumption; Tax revenue recycling

Funding

  1. New Huadu Business School Research Fund
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [12ZD059]
  3. Shandong Social Science Planning Fund Program [12DJJJ12]
  4. Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University (IIFSDU) [2012GN038]
  5. Ministry of Education Research of Social Sciences
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530309]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, China is the largest carbon emitter mainly due to growing consumption of fossil fuels. In 2009, the Chinese government committed itself to reducing domestic carbon emissions per unit of GDP by 40-45% by 2020 compared to 2005 levels. Therefore, it is a top priority for the Chinese government to adopt efficient policy instruments to reduce its carbon intensity. Against this background, this paper develops a general equilibrium model and seeks to provide empirical contributions by comparing the potential impacts of several different policy options to reduce China's carbon emissions. The main findings are as follows. Firstly, these climate policies would affect the structure of economy and contribute to carbon emissions reduction and carbon intensity reduction. Secondly, there would be significant differences in the economic and environmental effects among different climate policies and hence, the government would trade-off among different economic objectives to overcome any potential resistances. Thirdly, there would be considerable differences in the emissions effects of absolute and intensity-based carbon emissions controls, implying that the government might adopt different climate policies for absolute or intensity-based carbon emissions controls. Looking ahead, the government should trade-off among different objectives when designing climate reforms. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available