4.7 Article

Assessment of current Dutch energy transition policy instruments for the existing housing stock

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 981-996

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.050

Keywords

Dutch energy transition; Policy instruments; Existing housing stock

Funding

  1. Habiforum programme 'Innovative Land Use' (BSIK)
  2. Corpovenista project (Housing Associations Renewing the City)
  3. Dutch government and Stichting Bouwresearch (SBR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research assesses to what extent current Dutch energy transition policy instruments for the existing housing stock can fulfil local executive actors' needs and instigate adoption of energy efficiency measures by them. This is done by studying energy policy instruments for the existing housing stock in the Netherlands and in other European countries, and by an empirical research, which analyses barriers and needs of local executive actors. We found that, despite current Dutch energy transition policy instruments for the existing housing stock seem to fulfil local executive actors' needs to a large extent, complementary policy instruments are needed to stimulate and pressure the incumbent renovation regime. A long-term oriented financial rewarding system is needed to build up a structural market for the deployment of renewables, to increase the number of specialist jobs in the building sector, and to stimulate the development of integrated, standardized, building components. Furthermore, a long-term oriented financial rewarding system for energy efficiency investments in housing renovation projects, and a low VAT rate applied to energy efficient renovation measures, are needed. Finally, enforcement possibilities and sanctions (fines) should become an integrative part of Dutch energy certification regulation to make the certificate become part of a value chain. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available