4.7 Article

A feasibility study on a building's window system based on dye-sensitized solar cells

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 38-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.010

Keywords

Semi-transparent photovoltaic; DSSC (dye-sensitized solar cell); Window; Climate; Building energy

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20123030020090]
  2. INHA University Research Fund Grant [INHA-46473-1]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20123030020090] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the applicability of semi-transparent photovoltaics (PVs) that can both produce electricity and transmit light in the window system of a building. The potential of window-integrated semi-transparent photovoltaics (WISPVs) in the current global climate was evaluated by varying the window performance and the conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The feasibility of WISPVs was examined quantitatively based on the standard building envelope properties from the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and the reported DSSC conversion efficiency. The following seven cities, which are representative of what can typically be found in various climate zones, were selected for the building energy simulation: Miami (Zone 1), Sao Paulo (Zone 2), Sydney (Zone 3), New York (Zone 4), Seoul (Zone 4), Berlin (Zone 5), and Moscow (Zone 6). According to the simulation results from the ESP-r program, the WISPVs were more effective in Zone 4, but less effective in Zones 5 and 6. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available