4.7 Article

Effects of occupancy and lighting use patterns on lighting energy consumption

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 152-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.034

Keywords

Occupant behaviour; Energy consumption; Lighting system use; Monitoring study; Daylighting performance

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0001031, 2010-0007722]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0007722] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lighting is one of the largest energy users in artificially lit buildings. In this context, daylighting strategies that potentially reduce the needs of artificial lighting have been highlighted. However, they have not always materialized in practice, which is mainly due to the lack of understanding of occupant perception and behaviour of natural and artificial lighting systems. This study reports survey results from a monitoring campaign of four offices in Korea, which was conducted from February to June 2010 with an aim to reveal occupancy patterns, occupant use of lighting systems, and resulting lighting energy use. The results indicate that there are no statistically significant relationships between external illuminance and lighting use patterns, but there is a clear time of day effects (i.e. a strong tendency of turning on lighting on worker's first arrival in the morning). It has been found that the application of automatic dimming control for lighting with a design illuminance of 500 lx demands to the field studied offices can reduce lighting energy consumption by up to 43%. The study also shows that a change in occupancy patterns observed in this study leads to an increase in lighting energy use by up to 50%. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available