4.7 Article

Life Cycle Assessment of the inclusion of phase change materials (PCM) in experimental buildings

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 1517-1523

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.022

Keywords

LCA; PCM; TES; Buildings; Energy efficiency; E199

Funding

  1. Spanish government [ENE2008-06687-C02-01/CON, CTQ2009-14420-C02, DPI2008-040991]
  2. European Union [COST TU0802]
  3. Catalan Government [2009 SGR 534]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [DPI2008-04099/DPI, CTQ2009-14420]
  5. Spanish Ministry of External Affairs [A/023551/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work evaluates the environmental impact of including phase change materials (PCM) in a typical Mediterranean building. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is developed for three monitored cubicles built in Puigverd de Lleida (Spain). It is possible to control the inner temperature of the cubicles using a domestic heat pump for cooling and an electrical radiator for heating: The energy consumption is registered to determine the energy savings achieved. The aim is to analyze if these energy savings are large enough to balance the environmental impact originated during the manufacturing of PCM. Some hypothetical scenarios, such as different systems to control the temperature different PCM types or different weather conditions are proposed and studied using LCA process to point out the critical issues. Furthermore, a parametric analysis of the lifetime of buildings is developed. Results show that the addition of PCM in the building envelope, although decreasing the energy consumption during operation, does not reduce significantly the global impact throughout the lifetime of the building. For the hypothetical scenario considering summer conditions all year around and a lifetime of the building of 100 years, the use of PCM reduces the overall impact by more than 10%. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available