4.7 Article

Dimethyl Ether Autoignition at Engine-Relevant Conditions

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 2811-2817

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef400293z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CBET-1032453]
  2. Graduate School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  3. National Natural Science Foundation Key Project [50936004]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1032453] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The autoignition of dimethyl ether (DME), an alternative diesel engine fuel, has been studied at elevated pressures. Ignition delay times were measured in reflected shock experiments at temperatures from 697 to 1239 K and at a nominal pressure of 22-23 bar for DME/air/N-2 mixtures at equivalence ratios of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 and with 0-40% N-2 dilution. DME ignition delay times were observed to display three regimes of reactivity (high-temperature, negative-temperature-coefficient (NTC), and low-temperature) characteristic of paraffinic hydrocarbons and were shown to decrease with increasing equivalence ratio and increase with increasing dilution at the conditions studied. Ignition delay time measurements are compared to the detailed kinetic model of Zhao et al. (Zhao et al. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2008, 40, 1-18) with remarkable agreement; experiment-model deviations are mostly within the experimental uncertainties. Reaction flux and sensitivity analysis performed with the Zhao et al. model illustrates the importance of H abstraction from DME in controlling high-temperature autoignition (similar to 1200 K). At NTC and low-temperature conditions, the competition between the addition of molecular oxygen to and beta-scission of the methoxymethyl (CH3OCH2) and hydroperoxy-methoxymethyl (CH2OCH2O2H) radicals plays an important role in governing autoignition and its temperature dependence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available