4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Reducible Supports for Ni-based Oxygen Carriers in Chemical Looping Combustion

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 2073-2084

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef400184b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory under the RDS [DE-AC26-04NT41817]
  2. National Science Foundation (CBET) [1159853]
  3. University of Pittsburgh through a faculty fellowship
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1159853] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) is an emerging clean combustion technology for combustion of fossil fuels with inherent CO2 capture. In the present work, we investigate the use of reducible oxides (CeO2, La2O3) as oxygen carriers and as supports for nickel as active metal using TGA and fixed-bed reactor studies. Although CeO2 demonstrates reducibility (delta approximate to 8% at 800 degrees C with H-2) compared to minimal reducibility for La2O3, the oxygen carrying capacity is negligible compared to typical metals. However, ceria has a pronounced effect if used as support for Ni as oxygen carrier: In a comparison of reducible vs conventional, nonreducible oxide supports (Al2O3, SiO2), all carriers show thermal stability in TGA with H-2 as fuel but only reducible supports allow for complete carrier conversion (vs similar to 83% for Ni-Al2O3 with H-2 and similar to 75% with CH4 as fuel at 800 degrees C). Furthermore, the oxidation and reduction kinetics are accelerated, and the window for efficient total oxidation is strongly enlarged when using ceria supports. Overall, these results indicate significant potential for improved redox properties of oxygen carriers in CLC through a synergistic effect between metals and reducible oxides supports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available