4.7 Article

Measurement of Laminar Burning Velocities of Dimethyl Ether-Air Premixed Mixtures with N-2 and CO2 Dilution

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 23, Issue 1-2, Pages 735-739

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef8008663

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50821604, 50576070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of laminar burning velocities of dimethyl ether-air premixed mixtures with N-2 and CO2 dilution were made at room temperature and atmospheric pressure using the spherically expanding flame and schlieren photography over a wide range of dilution and equivalence ratios. The stretched flame propagation speed, the unstretched flame propagation speed, the unstretched laminar burning velocity, and the Markstein length (L-b) were obtained and analyzed. The results show that the flame speeds and the burning velocities decrease monotonously with the increase of the dilution ratio. The maximum value of the unstretched laminar burning velocity is presented at the equivalence ratio of 1.1, regardless of N-2 dilution ratios, while it slightly shifts to the rich mixture side with the increase of the CO2 dilution ratio. This phenomenon reveals the different dilution effect on the unstretched laminar burning velocity between the triatomic molecule gas CO2 and the diatomic molecule gas N-2. The Markstein length increases with the increase of the dilution ratio. The addition of diluents. to the stoichiometric and/or the lean mixture has a larger influence on the Markstein length compared to those of the rich mixture. The addition of diluents obviously enhances the stability of the flame front for the lean mixture, but the impact is slight for the rich mixture. The influence Of CO2 as the diluent on the flame speed and the flame stability is larger than that of N-2 as the diluent for dimethyl ether-air mixture combustion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available