4.7 Article

Experimental study and performance evaluation of a PV-blind embedded double skin facade in winter season

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 326-342

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.175

Keywords

Double skin facades; Photovoltaic blinds; Thermal performance; Comparison analysis; Experiment study

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578221]
  2. Innovation Project for Graduate Students of Hunan Province [CX2017B116]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Conservation and Environment Control, Zhuzhou, Hunan Province, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research, a double skin facade integrated with amorphous silicon photovoltaic blinds (PVB-DSF) is experimentally investigated. This structure can fulfill multiple functions of the power generation in situ and lowering heat gain or loss through glazing. The experiment rig was built to investigate the thermal and electrical performance of PVB-DSF system. The performance difference between ventilation and non-ventilation mode of PVB-DSF is first analyzed. Then thermal performance of PVB-DSF is demonstrated by comparison with traditional opaque facade (brick wall) and semi-transparent glazing facade (double skin facade) in winter conditions. The results demonstrate that PVB-DSF can reach much higher solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) and lower heat transfer coefficient in non-ventilation mode. PVB-DSF can save about 1121 Wh/(m(2)day) of heating energy in winter compared with the brick wall. By average value, the heat gain of PVB-DSF could be 73.74% higher than conventional DSF in winter. In addition, another type of semi-transparent PV-DSF is also compared with PVB-DSF. The results suggest that PVB-DSF can achieve better thermal performance but lower power generation efficiency comparing to semi-transparent PV-DSF. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available