Journal
ENERGY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 258-265Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.106
Keywords
Industrial structure; Energy intensity; China
Categories
Funding
- Newhuadu Business School Research Fund
- China Sustainable Energy Program [G-1305-18257]
- National Social Science Foundation of China [12ZD059]
- Ministry of Education [10 JBG 013, 11YJC790082]
- Social Science Foundation of Hunan in China [13YBA241]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Adjusting industrial structural is crucial for Chinese government's effort to reduce energy intensity. This paper, based on the fact that the Chinese industrial structure's two V-pattern evolutions and the nonlinear fluctuation of the declining rate of energy intensity, specifies a nonlinear threshold cointegration model for El (energy intensity), IS (industrial structure), TECH (technological progress), and PRICE (energy price) in order to investigate whether, and under which conditions, industrial structure is beneficial for reducing energy intensity. Results show that IS has different effects on EI when IS is greater or smaller than 40.435%. Specifically, in 1980-1982, 1995-1997, and 2003-2008, IS and PRICE produced positive effects on El, but produced negative effects in 1983-1994, 1998-2002, and 2009. TECH, including both capital embodied technological progress and Hicks-neutral technological progress, produced a negative effect on El in 1980-2009. Thus, the industrial structure has a structural bonus or negative effects on energy intensity only when IS is smaller than 40.435%. Therefore, China should reduce the ratio of industry added value to the GDP and stimulate technological progress to continuously reduce energy intensity. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available