4.7 Article

Multi-objective optimization for combined heat and power economic dispatch with power transmission loss and emission reduction

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 135-143

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.066

Keywords

Combined heat and power; Economic dispatch; Multi-objective line-up competition algorithm; Power transmission loss; Emission reduction

Funding

  1. National Cheng Kung University [HUA100-3-3-241]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA02206]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT:2013-IV-032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing concern over environmental considerations and the increasing fuel cost call for operating the energy station in a more economical and environmentally friendly way. This paper develops a multi-objective model for the CHPED (combined heat and power economic dispatch) problem to conventional energy stations, where the competing fuel cost and environmental impact objectives are simultaneously optimized. To model the problem accurately, both non-linear fuel cost functions with valve-point loading effects and power transmission loss are explicitly considered in this model. A novel MLCA (multi-objective line-up competition algorithm) is proposed to handle the problem as a nonlinear constrained multi-objective optimization problem. Some diversity-preserving mechanisms are employed in the MLCA to produce well-distributed Pareto-optimal solutions. Moreover, a fuzzy decision-making process is applied to extract the best compromise nondominated solution from the Pareto-optimal set. The performance of the proposed method is validated by two typical systems. Comparison results have demonstrated the superiority of the proposed approach and confirmed its potential to solve the larger multi-objective CHPED problem. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available