4.5 Article

Estimation of the Relative Arrival Time of Microseismic Events Based on Phase-Only Correlation

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en11102527

Keywords

microseismic event; relative arrival time; phase-only correlation; abnormal situations

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41604099, 41390455]
  2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources (Yangtze University) [K2016-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The arrival time of a microseismic event is an important piece of information for microseismic monitoring. The accuracy and efficiency of arrival time identification is affected by many factors, such as the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the records, the vast amount of real-time monitoring records, and the abnormal situations of monitoring equipment. In order to eliminate the interference of these factors, we propose a method based on phase-only correlation (POC) to estimate the relative arrival times of microseismic events. The proposed method includes three main steps: (1) The SNR of the records is improved via time-frequency transform, which is used to obtain the time-frequency representation of each trace of a microseismic event. (2) The POC functions of all pairs of time-frequency representations are calculated. The peak value of the POC function indicates the similarity of the traces, and the peak position in the time lag axis indicates the relative arrival times between the traces. (3) Using the peak values as weighting coefficients of the linear equations, consistency processing is used to exclude any abnormal situations and obtain the optimal relative arrival times. We used synthetic data and field data to validate the proposed method. Comparing with Akaike information criterion (AIC) and cross-correlation, the proposed method is more robust at estimating the relative arrival time and excluding the influence of abnormal situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available