4.6 Article

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Annotations of colorectal lesions

Journal

ENDOSCOPY
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages SE131-SE139

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309798

Keywords

mass screening; colorectal neoplasms; histopathology; classification; serrated lesions; multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines; population-based programmes

Funding

  1. Yorkshire Cancer Research
  2. Department of Health/Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Initiative
  3. European Union through the EU Public Health Programme [2005317]
  4. Public Affairs Committee of the United European Gastroenterology Federation
  5. American Cancer Society
  6. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on quality assurance in pathology was supplemented by an annex describing in greater detail some issues raised in the chapter, particularly details of special interest to pathologists. The content of the annex is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the issues discussed in the guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available