4.4 Article

Software process evaluation: a machine learning framework with application to defect management process

Journal

EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1531-1564

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-013-9254-z

Keywords

Software process evaluation; Defect management process; Sequence classification; Machine learning

Funding

  1. Nanyang Technological University SUG Grant [M58020016]
  2. AcRF Tier 1 Grant [RG 35/09]
  3. MOE Academic Tier-1 Grant [RG 33/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Software process evaluation is important to improve software development and the quality of software products in a software organization. Conventional approaches based on manual qualitative evaluations (e. g., artifacts inspection) are deficient in the sense that (i) they are time-consuming, (ii) they usually suffer from the authority constraints, and (iii) they are often subjective. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents a novel semi-automated approach to software process evaluation using machine learning techniques. In this study, we mainly focus on the procedure aspect of software processes, and formulate the problem as a sequence (with additional information, e. g., time, roles, etc.) classification task, which is solved by applying machine learning algorithms. Based on the framework, we define a new quantitative indicator to evaluate the execution of a software process more objectively. To validate the efficacy of our approach, we apply it to evaluate the execution of a defect management (DM) process in nine real industrial software projects. Our empirical results show that our approach is effective and promising in providing a more objective and quantitative measurement for the DM process evaluation task. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study to compare our proposed machine learning approach with an existing conventional approach (i. e., artifacts inspection). Finally, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available