4.6 Article

Influence of Cd2+ on Growth and Chlorophyll Fluorescence in a Hyperaccumulator: Lonicera japonica Thunb.

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 672-676

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00344-015-9483-z

Keywords

Lonicera japonica Thunb.; Cadmium; Hyperaccumulator; Chlorophyll fluorescence

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301340]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2012BAC05B05]
  3. major National Science & Technology project water pollution control and management'' of China [2012ZX07202008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorophyll fluorescence is an important instrument to study the responses of plants to cadmium (Cd) stress, which in turn can provide a better understanding of Cd tolerance in plants. In the present study, the influence due to cadmium (Cd2+) exposure on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence was investigated in a new hyperaccumulator-Lonicera japonica Thunb. Four levels of Cd2+ (0, 5, 25, and 125 mg kg(-1)) were added to the soil. After 90 days of Cd2+ exposure, maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (F (v)/F (m)) and effective quantum yield of photosystem II (I broken vertical bar PS II) of L. japonica showed an increase under 5 mg kg(-1) Cd2+ exposure, but decreased under higher concentrations of Cd(2+)exposure. However, when Cd concentrations in soil were up to the highest concentrations (125 mg kg(-1)), no significant differences of F (v)/F (m), I broken vertical bar PS II, photochemical quenching, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents compared with the control were observed. These results indicate that the good tolerance of L. japonica to Cd might result from effective mechanisms including the capacity to maintain good growth, photosynthetic pigment composition, and chlorophyll fluorescence activity, which would be beneficial to enhance the potential for phytoremediation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available