4.0 Article

Clinical Nihilism in Neuroemergencies

Journal

EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 27-+

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2008.08.009

Keywords

Prognosis; Do-not-resuscitate; Withdrawal of support; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Traumatic brain injury

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K23NS41240, U10NS058931, KL2RR024130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mortality and morbidity remain high from neurologic emergencies, such as acute stroke, traumatic brain injury, and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest. Decisions regarding initial aggressiveness of care must be made at the time of presentation, and perceived prognosis is often used as part of this decision-making process. These decisions are predicated on the accuracy of early outcome prediction, however. Decisions to limit treatment early after neuroemergencies must be balanced with avoidance of self-fulfilling prophecies of poor outcome attributable to clinical nihilism. This article examines the role of prognostication early after neuroemergencies, the potential impact of early treatment limitations, and how these may relate to communication with patients and surrogate decision makers in the context of these acute neurologic events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available